“banner728.gif"

CHANDA MUST KEEP QUIET…Lungu and Mswati didn’t know each other outside presidency – Chipimo

PRESIDENT Edgar Lungu and King Mswati have had no relationship outside the presidency so anything that he receives from another head of state would have come precisely as a result of him being President of Zambia, says Elias Chipimo.

The National Restoration Party leader, who has maintained that President Lungu violated the Anti-Corruption Act when he neglected to declare the land ‘gift’ from King Mswati, advised presidential aide Amos Chanda to keep quiet because he is likely to be prosecuted after 2021.

He said the excuses from the chief government spokesperson Dora Siliya and all those speaking for and on behalf of President Lungu were doing so to cover the tracks following the corrupt act.

Chipimo warned of a thorough investigation soon after the end of the PF regime in 2021.

“Probably you are going to hear some fake statements coming out that this land was only valued at that much because they are trying to cover up their tracks over essentially a corrupt act. There can never be any mistake about this particular issue, no matter what excuses the chief government spokesperson or any people speaking on behalf of the President, you will see that the story will keep on shifting because when a story is not straight, eventually the truth will come out,”

Chipimo said.

“What these people forget is that all this is on record and they are not going to be in power forever. If we have our way…they are going to be out of power by 2021 and when that happens, there will be an investigation and all these records are there and there will be liability and capability, so Amos, rather than defending, its probably best just to keep quiet and start thinking of a way, if he hasn’t received this land to simply say please don’t process it because I am likely to be prosecuted after 2021.”

He warned that because the laws were deemed weak did not mean that they were ineffective.

“Laws are designed so that there is transparency and full disclosure, but the main law which at hand here is the issue of the Anti-Corruption Act, I know that some people have said the laws are weak; they are weak but they are not ineffective. The problem we have is that we have weak institutions and it’s very difficult for somebody to enforce the law if the President decides that the people who it’s going to be enforced against need protection,”

Chipimo said.

He further called on Zambians to stand up and make sure that laws are enforced to avoid the continued corruption.

Chipimo said the only reason Chanda was fervently defending President Lungu on the land matter was that he, too, was a recipient of the ‘donation’. Chipimo, however, warned Chanda not to process the land as doing so would be setting up a date with prosecution and consequent jail.

He said President Lungu should have declared the said ‘gift’ because he received it as Republican President and not Edgar Lungu.

“The reason why Mr Amos Chanda is coming out strongly on this issue to defend the President, really its because he is defending himself, he himself is a recipient of this land donation. If we don’t stand up as Zambians to ask that this law be enforced, we are going to see the continued proliferation of the corruption causing all sorts of challenges to our economy. It should have been declared first of all that ‘I have received this gift’ then we should have somebody within Cabinet Office to tell the President whether this was received or not in his personal capacity or it’s being received by him in his official capacity,”

said Chipimo.

“You and I both know that President Lungu and King Mswati have had no relationship outside his Presidency. In other words, he has come to know the King of Swaziland entirely through his appointment and election as President of this country. Anything that he receives from that Head of State would have come precisely as a result of him being President of Zambia. This means that he may not be able to refuse the gift but he must declare it, and once it’s declared, that it’s of this substantial amount, then it can’t go to him as a person but come to the State of Zambia. What the law requires of him, and there is a cabinet circular by the way which is very clear, is that if you receive a gift above certain amounts, I think it’s about a thousand dollars…you have to be reasonable, somebody can give you a fountain pen, say cardio fountain pen, which is reasonably expensive but you do not expect that its something that’s going to be problematic.”

1 Comment

  1. Dr. Makasa Kasonde (Private Citizen)

    May 22, 2018 at 1:51 pm

    Consistency in the argument that the piece of land for a dwelling house (a plot) may represent property obtained unlawfully is apparent. What is not apparent is the separation of the political argument from the legal argument. Do you want prosecution or not? Then, say so, instead of beating about the bush. First, prosecution of sitting presidents start not in the media but in the legislature through impeachment. Two, impeachment of presidents can be a waste of valuable resources because voters usually prosecute through the ballot box. Three, opposition political leaders are interested parties and are limited by the conflict of interest. On that basis, the arguments are selfish arguments. Where is ACC in all that? Where is legislature in all that? Where is media debate for the viewer to make informed judgments? Can donors impose sanctions or not? Detractors are responsible for underdevelopment. They look for sensational news. They are fault finders looking for omissions and commissions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *