“banner728.gif"

World is less peaceful – IEP

THE Global Peace Index has revealed that the world is less peaceful today than at any time in the last decade.

The 12th edition of the annual Global Peace Index (GPI) report, produced by the international think-tank the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP), reveals a world in which the tensions, conflicts, and crises that emerged in the last decade remain unresolved, resulting in a gradual, sustained fall in peacefulness.

The largest contributors to the deterioration were escalations in both interstate and internal armed conflicts, rise in political terror and reduced commitment to UN peacekeeping. Syria, Afghanistan, South Sudan, Iraq and Somalia are the least peaceful countries while Iceland, New Zealand, Austria, Portugal and Denmark are the most peaceful countries.

The GPI is the world’s leading measure of global peacefulness. The report covers 99.7 per cent of the world’s population and uses 23 qualitative and quantitative indicators from highly respected sources to compile the index. The indicators are grouped into three key domains: ‘ongoing conflict’, ‘safety and security’, and ‘militarisation’.

All three domains deteriorated over the last year.

It stated that despite retaining its position as the most peaceful region in the world, Europe deteriorated for the third successive year.

“For the first time in the history of the index, a Western European country experienced one of the five largest deteriorations with Spain falling 10 places in the rankings to 30th, owing to internal political tensions and an increase in the impact of terrorism. In the last decade, 61 per cent of the countries in Europe deteriorated due to higher levels of political instability, increased impact from terrorism, and increased perceptions of criminality. No single Nordic country is more peaceful now than in 2008,” it stated.

Steve Killelea, founder and executive chairman of the IEP, said there had been progress on many fronts in the last decade but reaching greater peacefulness in the world had remained elusive. Killelea said the challenge was borne out in the research which showed that it was much harder to build peace than it is to destroy it.

He said this partly explains why countries at the bottom of the index remain trapped in prolonged conflict.

Killelea said on-going conflicts such as those in Syria, Yemen, Libya and Afghanistan had, in the past decade, contributed towards a significant rise in battlefield deaths, a surging refugee population and an increase in terrorism.

“Europe, the most peaceful region, has also suffered with 23 of the 36 countries deteriorating in peace in the last year, which is predominately the result of increasing political tensions and deteriorating relations between countries,” he said.

The report stated that surprisingly, the indicator with the largest improvement last year was military expenditure as a portion of GDP, with 88 countries spending less and 44 spending more.

It stated that average country military expenditure as a percentage of GDP had continued its decade long decline, with 102 countries spending less. The report stated that three of the five Scandinavian countries were amongst the largest weapons exporters when measured as a percentage of GDP.

“The economic impact of violence on the global economy in 2017 was $14.8 trillion in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms. This figure is equivalent to 12.4 per cent of the world’s economic activity (gross world product), or $1,988 for every person. The economic impact of violence increased by 2 per cent during 2017 due to increases in the cost of conflict and internal security expenditures, with the largest increases being in security spending occurring in China, Russia and South Africa,” it stated. “This year’s report also finds that highly peaceful countries also have considerable economic advantages over the least peaceful countries: inflation rates are nearly three times higher in low peace economies, interest rates were found to be over twice as high and foreign direct investment was nearly half.”

Killelea, commented: “The long-term economic benefits that flow from peace are of particular interest in this year’s report. Countries with the highest levels of peace averaged an additional two percentage points on their GDP growth rates over the last sixty years compared to the least peaceful countries. If we review the economic benefits of peace over the past decade, countries that improved in peace had GDP growth rates almost seven times higher than countries that decreased in peace. These are truly remarkable figures and underscore the economic benefits of peace.”

The report stated that the US score continued to decline, driven by increased political instability, despite reductions in the impact from terrorism and militarisation.

It stated that the US was now one of the seven G20 members amongst the 50 least peaceful countries in the world, along with Mexico, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, India, Turkey and Russia. The report stated that six of the nine regions of the world deteriorated in peacefulness with the four most peaceful regions, Europe, North America, Asia-Pacific and South America, all deteriorating too.

According to the regional overview: The Middle East and North Africa remained the world’s least peaceful region in 2018, despite a slight improvement in its score – the result of improvements in Iraq and Syria due to the diminishing reach of ISIL. Qatar experienced the single largest deterioration in peacefulness, as the political and economic boycott placed on it by the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Bahrain led to deteriorations in relations with neighbouring countries, and political instability.

“The broad trend in Europe has been a convergence in peace with the most peaceful, predominately those in Western Europe, declining in peacefulness, while those with weaker scores, many of them in Eastern Europe, improving. The Asia-Pacific region’s peacefulness deteriorated, with 11 countries falling while eight improved. Myanmar had the biggest deterioration, falling 15 places. Australia had the second largest deterioration due to higher levels of incarceration and higher levels of militarisation. In North America, the level of peacefulness in the United States has declined for the second consecutive year and is now at the worst level of any time since 2012. Canada suffered a deterioration in its terrorism impact rating after the Quebec City and Edmonton attacks,” it stated.

“Russia and Eurasia remained in seventh place despite a slight deterioration in the overall score. The Ukraine, the Kyrgyz Republic and Moldova improved their scores while nine other countries deteriorated. Russia had the second largest deterioration after Armenia. The biggest challenge to peace in Central America and the Caribbean is crime and corruption. For the last eight years, the region has had the worst scores in the index for homicide rate, violent crime, and perceptions of criminality. South America continues its struggle with lawlessness. The most significant riser in the region was Argentina, followed by Brazil and Colombia.

“The inequality of peace in South Asia continued to widen over the year, with the least peaceful nations – Afghanistan and Pakistan – continuing their decline, while the most peaceful – Bhutan and Sri Lanka – continued to improve. Sub-Saharan Africa was home to four of the five largest improvements in peacefulness, the Gambia, Liberia, Burundi, Senegal. Peacefulness in the Democratic Republic of the Congo continued to deteriorate, affecting the country’s prospects for weathering crises like the on-going Ebola epidemic.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *